Related Articles
David Kelley:
Look, first off, on each points, one of many outdated sayings is, if in case you have a extremely good case, you pound the info. And if in case you have a extremely unhealthy case in opposition to, you pound the desk.
And that is what we’re listening to, lots of screaming. Nobody’s actually coping with the info right here. I do not assume it is a honest evaluation to say you possibly can’t get a good trial wherever. That is actually a bogus declare, and that while you have a look at circumstances the place there have been change of venues motions which have been unsuccessful, you continue to see on the finish of the day a particularly reasonable trial, one that’s unassailable.
And I feel that is what we’ll see right here. This isn’t an election. The problems for the jury to resolve aren’t about public coverage. They don’t seem to be about politics. They’re about info. And jurors are sworn to uphold an oath to hear rigorously to the info, to the proof to the testimony, and make their choice based mostly on that.
And my expertise, in having tried numerous circumstances and been across the justice system, I feel jurors — I wish to say that, when anyone involves me and stated they’d wish to get out of jury responsibility, they complain and moan about doing jury service, however, as soon as they take that oath, I discover that the overwhelming majority abide their oath dutifully.
